Thursday, September 11, 2008

From "Choice" to Eugenics

What happens if a parent kills a child of theirs afflicted with Down Syndrome or some other disability? That's right, they go to JAIL, because they are MURDERERS (and if they don't, the justice department isn't doing its job.) But if the parents kill their baby before the umbilical cord is cut, they become a statistic and walk out the hospital scott-free. Aborting babies for any reason is murder; aborting them because of disabilities, gender or any other characteristics detected before birth is called EUGENICS. why does this all sound so familiar? OH, now I remember: the NAZIS had a similar game plan about 70 years ago! Whacking your baby because it's not a ten does not make you a loving mother, it makes you Adolf Hitler. When you abort a baby because he or she has Down, you're deciding that this child's life is disposable, and not as sacred as the life of a child without Down. The fact that you're too lazy and selfish to care for the child that needs something a bit more does not change the sanctity of human life.

Which brings me to a very important new rule...

New Rule: If you support abortion, the death penalty, euthanasia, or any combination of the above, you're not allowed to say you believe in the sanctity of human life. By supporting any form of killing, whether is the name of "choice", "justice" or "mercy", you are demonstrating that you value some human life more than other human life.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

More New Rules!

New Rule: Liberals need to stop ragging on Sarah Palin over her daughter's pregnancy. Yes, Palin raised the girl, but she's 17 years old and was more than capable of exercising her own free will when she opened her legs. They wouldn't call Obama a hypocrite if one day one of his girls grew up to be a pro-life or anti-gay activist, but hell, they're liberals, and that means they apply one set of standards to themselves and a completely different set of standards on everyone else.

New Rule: How about asking the CANADIAN PEOPLE whether or not THEY want Green Party leader Elizabeth May included in the leaders' debates this campaign? Of course the Four Stooges don't want a woman in their midst during the debate they already have a shrieky bitch who excels at playing the victim, and his name is Gilles Duceppe.

New Rule: Mitt Romney has to redo his RNC speech and take out the parts about America being the greatest nation in the history of the world! Mitt, America hasn't been Number One since before you could get an erection and feel guilty about masturbating next to the Book of Mormon.

New Rule: Stephane Dion and Stephen Harper need to stop bickering back and forth about who said what about the GST, and just tell us what the fuck they're going to do about it if they're elected! Oh right, I forgot, Dion can't make priorities or decisions, and Harper has governeed over the last 31 one months coasting on previous Liberal fuck ups, and he needs a little more time for reprogramming.